Call +44 20 7193 8021 Phone number

.

« Making Crowdsourcing Work For You | Main | Why Project Leadership Books Suck! »

June 07, 2007

How Rational Are We?

Teamwork linked handsMany valuable project team behaviours have, at their core, a requirement to accept ambiguity for extended periods. For instance, a project leader must simultaneously reconcile an unshakable confidence that the project will succeed with the recognition that their team, being only human, are flawed in their beliefs, research techniques and decision making processes. 

The belief that the project will succeed is necessary to gain and promote the confidence of the internal stake-holders (team members) and external stake-holders. 

The recognition that the team is flawed is necessary to prevent premature closure on important decisions, and ensure that the team works in a fully engaged fashion – progress is not made without a degree of dissatisfaction with the current state of things!

Many people will maintain a paradox when they see the phrases I just used: “being only human, are flawed”.  One of our human flaws is to act as-if we ourselves are not flawed, while others around us can be.  Sometimes we need the mirror turned back on ourselves!

For reflection, one area that I have found informative (and often entertaining) is the field of technical analysis (TA).  This is an area where the prize for winning is huge, but the TA community is confronting a system that is complex or chaotic.  This combination fosters a remarkable number of superstitious beliefs and elaborate pseudo-science.  (For a pithy primer, in his book “Evidence Based Technical Analysis”, David Aronson explores what he calls the “Illusion of Validity” citing 11 ways that the TA community deceives itself.)

Let me give you a quick shock to the system:  I’d like to quote this excerpt from Michael Shermer’s book “Why People Believe Weird Things” (1998), that references a 1990 Gallup survey of over 1,200 American adult’s beliefs:

67%

Personal psychic experiences

52%

Astrology

46%

Extra-sensory perception

42%

Communicating with the spirits of the dead

41%

Humans and dinosaurs living at the same time

35%

Ghosts

33%

A previously existing continent called Atlantis

22%

Aliens from space landing on earth

19%

Witches

So how rational are we?

— Philip Greenwood

Comments

Post your own comment:

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfa0d53ef00df351fc13f8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference How Rational Are We?:

Subscribe to Insights

Welcome to the Beaufortes Insights page. A collection of the best news, views, and insights into the world of practical project leadership; gathered and brought to you by our own practitioners.

Enter your e-mail address below and receive Beaufortes Insights direct to your inbox

Feed Statistics

PadlockThis Month's Free Report

The Project Leader's best kept secrets

What are the secrets that enable a few project managers to repeatedly succeed where others fail? Sign up for our free report and find out why they aren't what you expect?

.

Search this blog...

Lijit Search

Insights

Improving Results

52% improved productivity?

Most executives are rightly sceptical about the financial value of workshops, executive coaching, and leadership consulting. What is the real impact of an 'engaged' workforce on the bottom line? Recent research by respected survey house ISR provides some interesting answers. More

.

Wake Up CallAbout Us

Our wake up call!

In 2000 and 2001, the founders of Beaufortes, Philip Greenwood and Jason Bates, had an experience that caused them to look very carefully at the topic of project performance: It was to be a wake-up call... More

.

Insights

Add to Google

Just click the button above to recieve the best in Project Leadership news, views, and insights, direct to your Google homepage or reader

.

Call us on +44 20 7193 8021 or send a message

.