Time for a revolution in the music industry
A while back I introduced Flo Radio to you as a technique for producing environmental sound to enhance team productivity. The idea was to use Pandora’s streaming radio site, which allows you to set up “stations” that learn from the listeners preferences.
Being based in the UK, this morning I received an email from Tim Westergren of Pandora stating that they were about to start blocking transmission to us:
“It continues to astound me and the rest of the team here that the industry is not working more constructively to support the growth of services that introduce listeners to new music and that are totally supportive of paying fair royalties to the creators of music. I don't often say such things, but the course being charted by the labels and publishers and their representative organizations is nothing short of disastrous for artists whom they purport to represent - and by that I mean both well known and indie artists. The only consequence of failing to support companies like Pandora that are attempting to build a sustainable radio business for the future will be the continued explosion of piracy, the continued constriction of opportunities for working musicians, and a worsening drought of new music for fans. As a former working musician myself, I find it very troubling.
“We have been told to sign these totally unworkable license rates or switch off, non-negotiable...so that is what we are doing. Streaming illegally is just not in our DNA, and we have to take the threats of legal action seriously. Lest you think this is solely an international problem, you should know that we are also fighting for our survival here in the US, in the face of a crushing increase in web radio royalty rates, which if left unchanged, would mean the end of Pandora.
“We know what an epicenter of musical creativity and fan support the UK has always been, which makes the prospect of not being able to launch there and having to block our first listeners all the more upsetting for us.”
My opinion: The music industry, in fact the whole entertainment industry, is like a deer frozen in the headlights of an on-coming truck. They will shortly become road-kill unless they think through the implications of commodity-priced high-bandwidth communications, pervasive computing, and the virtualisation of content.

A while ago I published a blog piece on the use of sound in the office environment to
. But I’m an interested amateur where environmental sound is involved…
In one of those distracted moments I started wondering what I could do to have more of the “flow” moments – the good ones. I’ve had a study at home for many years, so it’s pretty established and comfortable, to my mind – although my fiancee calls it “the man room”.
I suggested in my
One of our successful adwords campaigns has this headline, but I confess it troubles me a bit. Is it possible to guarantee project success? I think it is, but it depends on your frame of reference. If you define a project as something like:
You can be happy at work.
Jason Bates wrote about 
This question has been playing on my mind: If stories are the most effective tool of influence, but are an inefficient way to communicate facts, what kind of communication style is most effective in today’s “attention deficit” business world? So for an experiment, let me try out a communication style: The “reduced” story line.
Looking at Jason’s posting on
The good people at MindJet have allowed me early access to their MindManager Project Management JetPack. As I read that sentence I realize that many readers won’t have a clue what I’m talking about, so let me explain:
I can say without a shadow of a doubt that
A few years ago I worked on a project with a client (global, ~140,000 people) that had an in-house change management methodology. I expected that this would make the job easier – after all, they must recognise the value of change management and know how to use it, surely.
Yesterday I was asked this question by a member of the Project Leadership Network – it’s such a good question I wanted to share it with everyone:
I believe that the vast majority of projects are not nearly visible enough, particularly among the extended stakeholder and customer groups, though I’m constantly under fire for holding this opinion.
In 1982, Gerald J. Gorn conducted an
(Go ahead, you can associate these things with us, if you like.)